Strata Plan 53247 v Hammond [2016] NSWLEC 1642

Strata Plan 53247 v Hammond [2016] NSWLEC 1642

The court found no evidence that the palms are likely to cause damage or injury to the applicant's property or any person. Fallen fronds have never caused damage or injury, and concerns about debris are adequately addressed by routine maintenance. Loss of light is not considered damage under the Trees Act and does not confer jurisdiction. The application for removal is therefore dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: Strata Plan 53247; Respondent: Peter Hammond
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Determination
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Trees Disputes Between Neighbours, Damage or Injury Not Likely

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Strata Plan 53247

Applicant

Peter Hammond

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Determination

  1. 1 Whether the three palms are likely to cause damage to the applicant's property
  2. 2 Whether the three palms are likely to cause injury to any person on the applicant's property
  3. 3 Whether debris from the palms constitutes damage or injury under the Trees Act

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no evidence that the palms are likely to cause damage or injury to the applicant's property or any person. Fallen fronds have never caused damage or injury, and concerns about debris are adequately addressed by routine maintenance. Loss of light is not considered damage under the Trees Act and does not confer jurisdiction. The application for removal is therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.