Bramley & anor v Strata Plan No. 50371 [2014] NSWLEC 1037
Although some sunlight to certain windows was obstructed, the obstruction was not shown to be sufficiently severe—particularly given other sources of shade and the aspect of the windows—and the balance of competing interests did not warrant intervention. In relation to views, the obstruction by the trees was at most moderate and not severe; therefore, jurisdiction to order removal was not established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment Application Determination
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['trees Disputes' 'hedges' 'sunlight Obstruction' 'view Obstruction' 'neighbour Disputes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment Application Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondent's trees severely obstruct sunlight to the applicants' windows under s 14E(2)(a)(i) of the Act" "Whether the respondent's trees severely obstruct views from the applicants' property under s 14E(2)(a)(ii) of the Act" "Whether the applicants' interests in remedying the obstruction outweigh other considerations under s 14E(2)(b)"]
Ratio Decidendi
Although some sunlight to certain windows was obstructed, the obstruction was not shown to be sufficiently severe—particularly given other sources of shade and the aspect of the windows—and the balance of competing interests did not warrant intervention. In relation to views, the obstruction by the trees was at most moderate and not severe; therefore, jurisdiction to order removal was not established.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment