In the Matter of Stuart Bros Pty Ltd [1995] FCA 153
Sufficient basis was shown, consistent with the principles laid down in Vagrand, to justify the grant of leave to proceed against the company in provisional liquidation, particularly in light of confusion caused by company actions.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory (application for Leave to Proceed Against Company in Provisional Liquidation)
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Proceed Against Company in Provisional Liquidation' 'mistake' 'estoppel' 'misrepresentation']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory (application for Leave to Proceed Against Company in Provisional Liquidation)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the bank should be granted leave under s. 471B of the Corporations Law to commence proceedings against the company in provisional liquidation.']
Ratio Decidendi
Sufficient basis was shown, consistent with the principles laid down in Vagrand, to justify the grant of leave to proceed against the company in provisional liquidation, particularly in light of confusion caused by company actions.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- ['Order in terms of paragraph 1 of the notice of motion granted.' 'Costs of the application to be costs in the principal proceeding.' 'Any order in the proceeding to be instituted may not be enforced without leave of the Court.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment