Inspector Yeung v Hill [2010] NSWIRComm 169

Inspector Yeung v Hill [2010] NSWIRComm 169

Leave to amend the applications for order is granted because the amendments do not introduce new or broader charges but merely provide additional particulars, and no injustice or actual prejudice to the defendants has been established notwithstanding the proximity to the limitation period.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Prosecution Under Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 / Interlocutory – Application for Leave to Amend Applications for Order
Outcome
Leave to amend granted; prosecutor to pay defendants' costs of the motions.
Legal Topics
['amendment of Applications for Order' 'pleading of Criminal Charges' 'particularisation of Offences' 'costs in Interlocutory Applications' 'limitation Periods']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Prosecution Under Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 / Interlocutory – Application for Leave to Amend Applications for Order

  1. 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to the prosecutor to amend particulars of the applications for order under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000' 'Whether amended applications amount to new or broader charges' 'Whether permitting amendments would be unjust due to limitation or prejudice']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to amend the applications for order is granted because the amendments do not introduce new or broader charges but merely provide additional particulars, and no injustice or actual prejudice to the defendants has been established notwithstanding the proximity to the limitation period.

Court Disposition

Leave to amend granted; prosecutor to pay defendants' costs of the motions.

Orders

  • ['Leave is granted to the prosecutor to amend the application for order in each matter in accordance with the amended application annexed to the notice of motion filed 21 April 2010.' "The prosecutor is to pay the defendants' costs of the notice of motion as agreed or as assessed."]