Clark v Tombs [2012] NSWCA 442
There were no substantial issues of principle raised by the proposed appeal and the amount in dispute was small; therefore, leave to appeal was refused, although the Court granted an extension of time for filing.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Brian Clark; Second Applicant: Rita Clark; Respondent: Stuart Tombs; Respondent: Jemma Louise Tombs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to extend time for filing granted; leave to appeal refused with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Extension of Time, Damages Assessment, Agistment Agreement, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Clark
First Applicant
Rita Clark
Second Applicant
Stuart Tombs
Respondent
Jemma Louise Tombs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was sufficient evidence for the rational assessment of damages for breach of contract
- 2 Whether the primary judge erred in assessing damages at $65,600
- 3 Whether leave to appeal should be granted where there is no issue of principle and only a small amount is in dispute
Ratio Decidendi
There were no substantial issues of principle raised by the proposed appeal and the amount in dispute was small; therefore, leave to appeal was refused, although the Court granted an extension of time for filing.
Court Disposition
Leave to extend time for filing granted; leave to appeal refused with costs.
Orders
- Leave to extend time for filing of the summons for leave is granted.
- The summons for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment