STX Pan Ocean Co Ltd v Bowen Basin Coal Group Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1002
The attestation of the affidavit before a notary public in accordance with South Korean law—where the deponent reads, acknowledges the truth of the statement, and signs and stamps it in the notary's presence—constitutes an affirmation in a similar form to that required by s 21(4) of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), recognising the gravity and importance of truth-telling sufficient for admissibility.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admissibility of Affidavit Evidence
- Outcome
- Objection dismissed; affidavit held admissible in form, subject to cross-examination and proper objections.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Foreign Affidavit' 'affirmation Under Evidence Act 1995 (cth)' 'form of Oath or Affirmation' 'notarial Certificates Under Foreign Law']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admissibility of Affidavit Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an affidavit attested before a notary public in South Korea satisfies the requirements of an oath or affirmation as per s 21(4) of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
The attestation of the affidavit before a notary public in accordance with South Korean law—where the deponent reads, acknowledges the truth of the statement, and signs and stamps it in the notary's presence—constitutes an affirmation in a similar form to that required by s 21(4) of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), recognising the gravity and importance of truth-telling sufficient for admissibility.
Court Disposition
Objection dismissed; affidavit held admissible in form, subject to cross-examination and proper objections.
Orders
- ['The affidavit made by Jung-Hyun Ahn on 19 July 2010 in South Korea may be read at the resumption of the trial, subject to proper objections and cross-examination, unless Mr Thomson notifies otherwise.' 'Costs thrown away by the necessity to raise the objection at the directions hearing on 20 August 2010 to be paid...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment