Beveridge v Style Tiles and Bathrooms Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCATAP 183
The Appeal Panel found that a binding contract was formed when the appellants accepted the quotation and made their selections, and the deposit became non-refundable after this point. The Home Building Act requirements were met, and no relevant error was made by the Tribunal. No special circumstances for costs were established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Against Original Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['contract Formation' 'deposits' 'unenforceable Contracts' 'home Building Act Compliance' 'costs in Tribunal Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Against Original Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a binding contract existed permitting the respondent to retain the deposit' 'Whether the requirements of s 7AAA of the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) were met' 'Whether special circumstances existed for awarding costs' "Whether the Tribunal's conduct of the hearing was fair"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Panel found that a binding contract was formed when the appellants accepted the quotation and made their selections, and the deposit became non-refundable after this point. The Home Building Act requirements were met, and no relevant error was made by the Tribunal. No special circumstances for costs were established.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is refused and the appeal is otherwise dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment