Prabowo, Subagio Lagaida v Republic of Indonesia & Anor [1997] FCA 11
The documents signed by Indonesian police officers satisfy s 19(7) of the Extradition Act as they fall within the meaning of 'officer'; the magistrate's determination that the offences, including failure to record a banking transaction, would constitute extradition offences if the equivalent conduct had occurred in NSW, is sufficient for eligibility for surrender regardless of whether the treaty specifically embraces that offence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review Under S 21 of the Extradition Act 1988 / Federal Court Review of Magistrate's Order Determining Eligibility for Surrender
- Outcome
- Application dismissed. Magistrate's order confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['dual Criminality' 'authentication of Supporting Documents' 'eligibility for Surrender' 'extradition Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review Under S 21 of the Extradition Act 1988 / Federal Court Review of Magistrate's Order Determining Eligibility for Surrender
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether supporting documents signed by a non-judicial officer of the extradition country are admissible under s 19(7) of the Extradition Act 1988' 'Whether the offence specified (failure to record a banking transaction contrary to Indonesian law) qualifies as an extradition offence under the Act and Treaty']
Ratio Decidendi
The documents signed by Indonesian police officers satisfy s 19(7) of the Extradition Act as they fall within the meaning of 'officer'; the magistrate's determination that the offences, including failure to record a banking transaction, would constitute extradition offences if the equivalent conduct had occurred in NSW, is sufficient for eligibility for surrender regardless of whether the treaty specifically embraces that offence.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed. Magistrate's order confirmed.
Orders
- ['The order of the second respondent is confirmed.' "The applicant pay the respondents' costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment