Drake v Wood Marshall Williams Solicitors [2015] NSWSC 1091
The plaintiffs' right to sue for damages in negligence vested in the trustee upon bankruptcy. Upon discharge, that right did not divest from the trustee and revest in the plaintiffs; no assignment was made. Therefore, the proceedings are incompetent and must be dismissed.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Lawrence Drake; Second Plaintiff: Judith Drake; First Defendant: Neale Marshall; Second Defendant: Charles Parisi
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Dismissal Application
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Summary Dismissal, Bankruptcy, Vesting of Causes of Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lawrence Drake
First Plaintiff
Judith Drake
Second Plaintiff
Neale Marshall
First Defendant
Charles Parisi
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Dismissal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the right to bring proceedings divested from the trustee upon discharge from bankruptcy
- 2 Whether plaintiffs have standing to sue after discharge from bankruptcy without assignment from trustee
- 3 Whether claim discloses a reasonable cause of action
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs' right to sue for damages in negligence vested in the trustee upon bankruptcy. Upon discharge, that right did not divest from the trustee and revest in the plaintiffs; no assignment was made. Therefore, the proceedings are incompetent and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- The amended statement of claim filed 30 March 2015 is dismissed.
- The proceedings are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment