COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SYDNEY v EX-SERVICEMAN'S CAR LAUNDRY PTY LTD [1988] NSWCA 30
The appeal is competent because the summary judgment from the District Court is arguably the final disposal of the whole action and qualifies as a judgment 'in an action' under s128 and s130 of the District Court Act 1973. The existence of an arguable issue makes summary dismissal inappropriate; the merits are to be determined at the appeal hearing.
- Parties
- Claimant: Council of the City of Sydney; Opponent: Ex-Serviceman's Car Laundry Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Incompetent
- Outcome
- Motion to dismiss appeal as incompetent refused; appeal to proceed
- Legal Topics
- Summary Dismissal of Appeal, Competence of Appeal, Summary Judgment, Appeal From District Court, Construction of Statutory Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Council of the City of Sydney
Claimant
Ex-Serviceman's Car Laundry Pty Ltd
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Incompetent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a summary dismissal of appeal as incompetent is appropriate where there is a seriously arguable issue
- 2 Whether an appeal lies to the Supreme Court from a District Court summary judgment under Pt11A r 2(1) District Court Rules
- 3 Whether the judgment is 'in an action' for purposes of appeal under s128 and s130 of District Court Act 1973
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is competent because the summary judgment from the District Court is arguably the final disposal of the whole action and qualifies as a judgment 'in an action' under s128 and s130 of the District Court Act 1973. The existence of an arguable issue makes summary dismissal inappropriate; the merits are to be determined at the appeal hearing.
Court Disposition
Motion to dismiss appeal as incompetent refused; appeal to proceed
Orders
- Motion dismissed with costs.
- Hearing of appeal expedited and set down on 8 June 1988.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment