R v Singh; R v Mamuti; R v Pardoe; R v Yilmazlar [2020] NSWDC 226

R v Singh; R v Mamuti; R v Pardoe; R v Yilmazlar [2020] NSWDC 226

Aggregate terms of imprisonment and non-parole periods imposed for each offender, reflecting the seriousness of drug supply and participation in a criminal group, mitigated by early guilty pleas, personal circumstances, and special circumstances. Mamuti's dominant purpose was financial gain, aggravating his offending; Singh, Pardoe, and Yilmazlar's involvement primarily supported their own drug habits, mitigating their culpability. Special circumstances for parole adjustments applied to each offender.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Offender: Vishal Singh; Offender: Stephen Mamuti; Offender: Thomas Pardoe; Offender: Metin Yilmazlar
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 May 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Outcome
Offenders convicted and sentenced; aggregate terms of imprisonment imposed with non-parole periods and parole eligibility set; bail continued for Yilmazlar pending assessment report.
Legal Topics
Supplying Prohibited Drug, Participating in Criminal Group, Sentencing, Drug Offences
Criminal Law Supplying Prohibited Drug Participating in Criminal Group Sentencing Drug Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Vishal Singh

Offender

Stephen Mamuti

Offender

Thomas Pardoe

Offender

Metin Yilmazlar

Offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Sentencing for supplying prohibited drug in quantities greater than commercial/large commercial/indictable quantity
  2. 2 Sentencing for participating in a criminal group contributing to criminal activity
  3. 3 Objective and subjective assessment for supply and participation offences

Ratio Decidendi

Aggregate terms of imprisonment and non-parole periods imposed for each offender, reflecting the seriousness of drug supply and participation in a criminal group, mitigated by early guilty pleas, personal circumstances, and special circumstances. Mamuti's dominant purpose was financial gain, aggravating his offending; Singh, Pardoe, and Yilmazlar's involvement primarily supported their own drug habits, mitigating their culpability. Special circumstances for parole adjustments applied to each offender.

Court Disposition

Offenders convicted and sentenced; aggregate terms of imprisonment imposed with non-parole periods and parole eligibility set; bail continued for Yilmazlar pending assessment report.

Orders

  • Singh: aggregate term of imprisonment of 3 years 8 months with a non-parole period of 1 year 7 months 20 days, eligibility for parole.
  • Pardoe: aggregate term of imprisonment of 3 years 3 months with a non-parole period of 1 year 7 months 19 days, eligibility for parole.