R v HONG, Michael [2016] NSWDC 388
The court sentenced the offender for two counts of supplying methylamphetamine, taking into account Form 1 offences associated with the first count, the fact that each offence was committed while on bail, and applying a 10% utilitarian discount for guilty pleas. Special circumstances were found under s 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act for adjustment of the parole period. Sentences were partially accumulated in accordance with totality principles. Full-time custody was imposed as no alternative was appropriate.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina (Crown); Offender: Chi King Hong (also referred to as Michael Hong)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to terms of imprisonment on both counts; sentences partially accumulated; non-parole period and parole eligibility fixed; forfeiture orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Supply Prohibited Drug, Sentencing, Utilitarian Benefit for Plea, Time Served on Remand, Totality Principle, Special Circumstances, Accumulation of Sentences, Form 1 Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina (Crown)
Prosecution
Chi King Hong (also referred to as Michael Hong)
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for two offences of supplying methylamphetamine
- 2 Consideration of Form 1 offences in sentencing
- 3 Effect of plea of guilty on sentence (utilitarian discount)
Ratio Decidendi
The court sentenced the offender for two counts of supplying methylamphetamine, taking into account Form 1 offences associated with the first count, the fact that each offence was committed while on bail, and applying a 10% utilitarian discount for guilty pleas. Special circumstances were found under s 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act for adjustment of the parole period. Sentences were partially accumulated in accordance with totality principles. Full-time custody was imposed as no alternative was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to terms of imprisonment on both counts; sentences partially accumulated; non-parole period and parole eligibility fixed; forfeiture orders made.
Orders
- Count 1: Convicted and sentenced to 1 year 9 months imprisonment without non-parole period, commencing 23 June 2014, expiring 22 March 2016.
- Count 2: Convicted and sentenced to 1 year 5 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 10 months, commencing 23 June 2015, expiring 22 September 2017; earliest parole eligibility 22 April 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment