R v Ngo, R v Dao, R v Dinh [2000] NSWSC 976
Given the exceptional nature of this case—a murder of a Member of Parliament, two prior inconclusive trials, extraordinary publicity, and risk of prejudicing the third trial—the court has both the power and justification to make a non-publication order on affidavit contents and today's proceedings to protect the integrity of the upcoming trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 September 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application Prior to Third Trial
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['suppression Orders' 'open Justice' 'jury Integrity' 'murder Trial' 'non Publication Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application Prior to Third Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the court has power to make a non-publication order in the absence of an order to sit in camera' 'Whether the circumstances justify restriction on publication of affidavit contents regarding jury conduct in previous trial' 'Balance between open justice and risk to fair trial']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the exceptional nature of this case—a murder of a Member of Parliament, two prior inconclusive trials, extraordinary publicity, and risk of prejudicing the third trial—the court has both the power and justification to make a non-publication order on affidavit contents and today's proceedings to protect the integrity of the upcoming trial.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- ['That up to and including 3 October 2000 there be no publication of the contents of pars 12 to 22 of the affidavit of Det Nick Kaldas sworn 23 August 2000 (excluding use by legal representatives of the accused or Crown for the 3 October hearing).' 'That there be no publication of the contents of any conversations...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment