R v Alqudsi [2016] NSWSC 1168

R v Alqudsi [2016] NSWSC 1168

Based on material in the affidavit, suppression and non-publication orders are required under s 8(1)(a) and (b) of the Act to prevent prejudice to justice and security; the duration and scope of orders are tailored to those requirements.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Accused: Hamdi Alqudsi
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application (suppression/non Publication Orders)
Outcome
suppression and non-publication orders granted
Legal Topics
Suppression Orders, Non Publication Orders
Criminal Law Procedure Suppression Orders Non Publication Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Hamdi Alqudsi

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Interlocutory Application (suppression/non Publication Orders)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether suppression and non-publication orders should be made under Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) and Surveillance Devices Act 2004 (Cth)

Ratio Decidendi

Based on material in the affidavit, suppression and non-publication orders are required under s 8(1)(a) and (b) of the Act to prevent prejudice to justice and security; the duration and scope of orders are tailored to those requirements.

Court Disposition

suppression and non-publication orders granted

Orders

  • No publication of specified images annexed to statements and obtained by warrant.
  • No publication of technical means by which protected images were obtained.