Aneja v Hume City Council [1996] IRCA 96
The applicant was a temporary employee on a specified period contract, extended on a short-term basis for agreed administrative reasons. This status excluded the applicant from the definition of 'employee' for the purposes of the Agreement and the protections of the Industrial Relations Act under Regulation 30B(1)....
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Law Unfair Termination / Decision on Application for Redundancy and Redeployment Entitlements
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['unfair Termination' 'specified Period Contract' 'employee Status Under Industrial Relations Act' 'entitlements to Redundancy and Redeployment']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Industrial Law Unfair Termination / Decision on Application for Redundancy and Redeployment Entitlements
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether applicant was a permanent or temporary employee' 'Whether temporary employment excluded applicant from Act and Agreement' 'Whether the extension of temporary position changed employment status' 'Whether applicant entitled to redundancy and redeployment rights']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was a temporary employee on a specified period contract, extended on a short-term basis for agreed administrative reasons. This status excluded the applicant from the definition of 'employee' for the purposes of the Agreement and the protections of the Industrial Relations Act under Regulation 30B(1). The application is therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- ['That the application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment