Susan Elizabeth Salisbury -v- Philip Edward Cullen Waugh [2007] NSWSC 872

Susan Elizabeth Salisbury -v- Philip Edward Cullen Waugh [2007] NSWSC 872

The Plaintiff's financial and non-financial contributions during the six-and-a-half year de facto relationship have already been adequately recognised by her retention of the Dobie Street property (and proceeds of sale) and relief from the partnership deficit. Given the Plaintiff achieved significant financial...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Plaintiff: Susan Elizabeth Salisbury; Defendant: Philip Edward Cullen Waugh
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 August 2007
Procedural Posture
Property (relationships) Act 1984 Proceedings / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed; Plaintiff to pay Defendant's costs; liberty reserved to apply for declarations.
Legal Topics
De Facto Relationship, Property Adjustment, Contributions, Partnership Liability
Family Law Equity De Facto Relationship Property Adjustment Contributions Partnership Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Susan Elizabeth Salisbury

Plaintiff

Philip Edward Cullen Waugh

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Property (relationships) Act 1984 Proceedings / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to an adjustment of interests in property under section 20(1) of the Property (Relationships) Act 1984
  2. 2 Consideration of respective financial and non-financial contributions, including homemaker and parent role
  3. 3 Whether court should consider present and future needs of applicant

Ratio Decidendi

The Plaintiff's financial and non-financial contributions during the six-and-a-half year de facto relationship have already been adequately recognised by her retention of the Dobie Street property (and proceeds of sale) and relief from the partnership deficit. Given the Plaintiff achieved significant financial benefit and the Court must disregard present and future needs, no further adjustment or order for transfer of property or payment is warranted.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed; Plaintiff to pay Defendant's costs; liberty reserved to apply for declarations.

Orders

  • Proceedings be dismissed.
  • Plaintiff to pay costs of Defendant.