Galafassi v Kelly (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 239
The respondent must repay appellants the specified overpaid sum as part of the restitution following partial reversal of the principal judgment, and the appellants must pay 90% of the respondent's costs of the appeal, reflecting the respondent's greater but not total success. No interest will be awarded on costs as circumstances do not warrant such order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment Decision on Costs and Restitution
- Outcome
- Respondent to repay appellants the sum of $74,515.77; appellants to pay 90% of respondent's costs of appeal; no order for interest on costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs of Appeal' 'costs Follow the Event' 'mixed Outcome' 'interest on Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment Decision on Costs and Restitution
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Entitlement to repayment of amounts overpaid following partial reversal of judgment' 'Apportionment of costs following mixed outcome on appeal' 'Entitlement to interest on costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent must repay appellants the specified overpaid sum as part of the restitution following partial reversal of the principal judgment, and the appellants must pay 90% of the respondent's costs of the appeal, reflecting the respondent's greater but not total success. No interest will be awarded on costs as circumstances do not warrant such order.
Court Disposition
Respondent to repay appellants the sum of $74,515.77; appellants to pay 90% of respondent's costs of appeal; no order for interest on costs.
Orders
- ['The respondent repay to the appellants the sum of $74,515.77.' "The appellants pay 90% of the respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment