Lovrovich & Anor v Mosman Council [2013] NSWLEC 1217
The Court held that a privacy screen of approximately 3.2m in length should be installed on the upper level verandah to protect neighbours' visual privacy, but no such screen is needed on the lower level; the proposed conversion of the carport to a garage and construction of an entry canopy would unacceptably impact the streetscape and are not permitted; all other elements of the application, as amended by agreement, are acceptable and merit approval, subject to appropriate conditions.
- Parties
- Applicant: Susan Lovrovich; Applicant: Chris Valacos; Respondent: Mosman Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment Following Hearing After Unsuccessful Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Orders reserved pending filing of final conditions of consent by council; part approval, part refusal.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Compliance With Planning Controls, Impact on Streetscape, Privacy Screens, Garage and Carport Approvals, Amenity, Streetscape Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Susan Lovrovich
Applicant
Chris Valacos
Applicant
Mosman Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment Following Hearing After Unsuccessful Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conditions of consent on a modified development consent should be amended regarding privacy screens
- 2 Whether development application for conversion of carport to garage, new structures, and other alterations should be approved
- 3 Compliance with Mosman planning controls and impact on privacy and streetscape
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that a privacy screen of approximately 3.2m in length should be installed on the upper level verandah to protect neighbours' visual privacy, but no such screen is needed on the lower level; the proposed conversion of the carport to a garage and construction of an entry canopy would unacceptably impact the streetscape and are not permitted; all other elements of the application, as amended by agreement, are acceptable and merit approval, subject to appropriate conditions.
Court Disposition
Orders reserved pending filing of final conditions of consent by council; part approval, part refusal.
Orders
- Council directed to file final conditions of consent reflecting agreed positions and findings by 4pm, 18 November 2013.
- Consent to be modified to delete lower level privacy screen requirement and to require an upper level screen of approximately 3.2m in length.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment