Zaronias v. Constantine [2005] NSWCA 324

Zaronias v. Constantine [2005] NSWCA 324

The primary judge's finding that the parties did not live together as a couple for the requisite period was based on a thorough evaluation of the evidence; criticisms of the judge's reasoning did not identify any material error or justify appellate intervention.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 September 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['family Relationships' 'domestic Relationships' 'cohabitation']
['family Law'] ['family Relationships' 'domestic Relationships' 'cohabitation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the appellant and respondent lived together as a couple for at least two years']

Ratio Decidendi

The primary judge's finding that the parties did not live together as a couple for the requisite period was based on a thorough evaluation of the evidence; criticisms of the judge's reasoning did not identify any material error or justify appellate intervention.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs']