Visible Results Properties Inc v Sushi Train (Australia) Pty Limited [2007] FCA 38

Visible Results Properties Inc v Sushi Train (Australia) Pty Limited [2007] FCA 38

The Sushi Train system did not infringe because, although it delivered a promotional program selected response, contained user personal data in the membership number and date of joining, and produced a personalised message, the promotional program rules were not applied to that user personal data. The algorithm...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 February 2007
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement Proceeding With Amended Cross Claim for Revocation / Reasons for Judgment and Orders After Hearing
Outcome
The application and the amended cross-claim were dismissed.
Legal Topics
['patent Infringement' 'patent Construction' 'combination Patent' 'novelty' 'anticipation' 'reverse Infringement' 'cross Claim for Revocation' 'loyalty Card System and Method']
['intellectual Property' 'patents'] ['patent Infringement' 'patent Construction' 'combination Patent' 'novelty' 'anticipation' 'reverse Infringement' 'cross Claim for Revocation' 'loyalty Card System and Method']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Patent Infringement Proceeding With Amended Cross Claim for Revocation / Reasons for Judgment and Orders After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the respondent infringed the patent in suit by its loyalty card system during the closed period between the end of 2000 and July 2005.' 'Whether the patent was novel by reference to European Patent No 0689160A1.' 'Whether issues concerning title to the patent and licence arrangements needed to be determined.' 'Whether the Sushi Train system involved a promotional program selected response.' 'Whether the Sushi Train card contained user personal data.' 'Whether the promotional program rules were applied to user personal data.' 'Whether the human readable message in claim 13 was personalised.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Sushi Train system did not infringe because, although it delivered a promotional program selected response, contained user personal data in the membership number and date of joining, and produced a personalised message, the promotional program rules were not applied to that user personal data. The algorithm awarding one point for every $2 applied only to transaction data, so essential integer (d)(v) of claim 1 and corresponding integer (g) of claim 13 were not satisfied, and the dependent claims were not infringed. The amended cross-claim for revocation failed because the Euro-patent did not give an unmistakeable or clear instruction that promotional program rules were applied to user...

Court Disposition

The application and the amended cross-claim were dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' 'The amended cross-claim be dismissed.' 'The parties file submissions on costs within 14 days.' 'The time for filing and serving any notice of appeal run from the date of orders as to costs.']