Brendan White v R [2009] NSWCCA 118
Judge English had the applicant's pre-sentence custody clearly in mind and gave credit for it by accepting counsel's submission to impose a sentence of less than two years and suspend its execution. Because that custody had already been taken into account, Judge Hock was correct to proceed on that assumption when revoking the bond and was not shown to have erred by not backdating the sentence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['suspended Sentence' 'pre Sentence Custody' 'revocation of Good Behaviour Bond' 'non Parole Period' 'backdating Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Judge English failed to demonstrably take into account the applicant's pre-sentence custody when imposing the suspended sentence for affray." 'Whether Judge Hock erred by failing to backdate the sentence after revoking the bond to take into account pre-sentence custody.']
Ratio Decidendi
Judge English had the applicant's pre-sentence custody clearly in mind and gave credit for it by accepting counsel's submission to impose a sentence of less than two years and suspend its execution. Because that custody had already been taken into account, Judge Hock was correct to proceed on that assumption when revoking the bond and was not shown to have erred by not backdating the sentence.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment