Suters Architects Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 726
The Court upheld the appeal because there was no sufficient reason to refuse the modified proposal. The subject site itself amalgamated six lots and there was no statutory requirement to consolidate with Kennards; acquisition or access through Kennards and Wanderers Way was commercially and physically unrealistic on the evidence. The proposed access from Pretoria Parade was feasible, the building provided acceptable gateway character, and the principal design concerns concerning solar access, privacy, landscaping, setbacks, balconies and future access could be addressed by amendments and conditions, including deferred commencement conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of DA No.2233/04 for Demolition and Construction of a 9 Storey Mixed Use Development
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; deferred development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application Refusal' 'mixed Use Development' 'residential Flat Development' 'site Amalgamation' 'urban Design' 'deep Soil Planting' 'solar Access' 'privacy' 'vehicular Access' 'development Control Plans']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of DA No.2233/04 for Demolition and Construction of a 9 Storey Mixed Use Development
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant had made sufficient efforts to achieve site amalgamation with the adjacent Kennards property and whether lack of amalgamation justified refusal.' 'Whether the proposed development achieved acceptable planning and urban design outcomes for a gateway site in the Hornsby Town Centre and Pound Road Precinct.' 'Whether the proposed basement and vehicular access arrangements were acceptable despite the Council masterplan preference for access via Wanderers Way.' 'Whether the proposal provided acceptable deep soil planting and landscaping.' 'Whether the proposal achieved adequate solar access under SEPP 65 and the Residential Flat Design Code.' 'Whether the proposal created unacceptable privacy, safety, appearance, view or unit layout impacts.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court upheld the appeal because there was no sufficient reason to refuse the modified proposal. The subject site itself amalgamated six lots and there was no statutory requirement to consolidate with Kennards; acquisition or access through Kennards and Wanderers Way was commercially and physically unrealistic on the evidence. The proposed access from Pretoria Parade was feasible, the building provided acceptable gateway character, and the principal design concerns concerning solar access, privacy, landscaping, setbacks, balconies and future access could be addressed by amendments and conditions, including deferred commencement conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; deferred development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Deferred development consent is granted to a 9-storey residential flat building with commercial uses on the ground floor, and 53 car spaces in on-site parking at Nos. 93-103 Pacific Highway, Hornsby as shown in drawings nominated in Part 2-Condition 1 of Annexure A, all as amended by and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment