Tleis v Sutherland Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 1340
The Court was satisfied that it held the statutory power to modify the development control order as agreed between the parties, the agreed modifications addressed the respondent’s compliance concerns within the relevant legislative framework, and the agreement was one the Court could have properly made in exercise of its functions; hence the appeal was upheld and the DCO modified as per the agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Appeal / Determination After Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between Parties
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Development control order modified as per agreed terms.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Control Order' 'compliance Order' 'modification of Orders' 'agreement Under Conciliation' 'jurisdiction of Land and Environment Court']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal / Determination After Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether development control order (DCO) in respect of 12 Dodson Avenue Cronulla should be modified to permit retention of certain works not originally approved under the landscape plan associated with the development consent DA21/0078']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that it held the statutory power to modify the development control order as agreed between the parties, the agreed modifications addressed the respondent’s compliance concerns within the relevant legislative framework, and the agreement was one the Court could have properly made in exercise of its functions; hence the appeal was upheld and the DCO modified as per the agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Development control order modified as per agreed terms.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' "The development control order issued by Sutherland Shire Council on 6 December 2023 (Ref RN2023-026412 NOT 15076) is modified pursuant to s 8.18(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as follows: Under 'To Do What', the order is amended: 1. Comply with development consent...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment