Musolino v Sutherland Shire Council [2023] NSWLEC 1604
The appeal is upheld and development consent granted as the applicant's cl 4.6 request demonstrated sufficient environmental planning grounds for contravention of the maximum height standard, the development meets the objectives of the standard and the zone, and all relevant jurisdictional prerequisites are satisfied.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Ilario Musolino; Second Applicant: Lisa Marie Musolino; Respondent: Sutherland Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Development Appeal / Conciliation Conference, Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted
- Legal Topics
- Development Standards, Building Height, Development Consent, Local Environmental Plans, Conciliation Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ilario Musolino
First Applicant
Lisa Marie Musolino
Second Applicant
Sutherland Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal / Conciliation Conference, Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed development justifies contravention of maximum building height standard under cl 4.3 of the Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015
- 2 Whether jurisdictional prerequisites for granting development consent are met, including consideration of environmental planning grounds and impacts
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and development consent granted as the applicant's cl 4.6 request demonstrated sufficient environmental planning grounds for contravention of the maximum height standard, the development meets the objectives of the standard and the zone, and all relevant jurisdictional prerequisites are satisfied.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted
Orders
- The written request under cl 4.6 of the Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015 prepared by Wynne Planning, dated September 2023 in relation to cl 4.3 is upheld.
- The appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment