Sutherland Shire Council v Major [2014] NSWCA 403

Sutherland Shire Council v Major [2014] NSWCA 403

The stay was granted on condition that the appellant pay $70,000 within 28 days because the evidence showed a risk that the respondent would not be able to repay more than a small proportion of money paid before the appeal was finalised if the appeal succeeded. However, the appellant's best possible outcome on appeal was a reduction of damages to about $46,000, and there was effectively no dispute that the respondent would retain at least about $50,000 even if the appeal succeeded. The evidence also indicated only a minimal risk that the respondent could not repay up to about $20,000. The primary Judge's condition of $105,000 was not appropriate because insufficient attention appeared to...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 November 2014
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application for a Conditional Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal / Application in the Court of Appeal to Stay the District Court Judgment Pending Determination of the Appeal
Outcome
Order of Cogswell DCJ of 29 October 2014 set aside; stay of the judgment of Cogswell DCJ of 9 July 2014 granted on condition that the appellant pay the respondent $70,000 within 28 days; costs of the application to be costs in the cause.
Legal Topics
['conditional Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal' 'security Pending Appeal' 'capacity to Repay Judgment Sum' 'personal Injury Damages']
['practice and Procedure' 'civil Procedure'] ['conditional Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal' 'security Pending Appeal' 'capacity to Repay Judgment Sum' 'personal Injury Damages']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application for a Conditional Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal / Application in the Court of Appeal to Stay the District Court Judgment Pending Determination of the Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the judgment of Cogswell SC DCJ given on 9 July 2014 should be stayed pending determination of the appellant's appeal." 'Whether the stay should be conditional on payment to the respondent of $50,000, $105,000, or another amount.' 'Whether the evidence supported a conclusion that the respondent might be unable to repay money paid before the appeal was finalised if the appeal succeeded.']

Ratio Decidendi

The stay was granted on condition that the appellant pay $70,000 within 28 days because the evidence showed a risk that the respondent would not be able to repay more than a small proportion of money paid before the appeal was finalised if the appeal succeeded. However, the appellant's best possible outcome on appeal was a reduction of damages to about $46,000, and there was effectively no dispute that the respondent would retain at least about $50,000 even if the appeal succeeded. The evidence also indicated only a minimal risk that the respondent could not repay up to about $20,000. The primary Judge's condition of $105,000 was not appropriate because insufficient attention appeared to...

Court Disposition

Order of Cogswell DCJ of 29 October 2014 set aside; stay of the judgment of Cogswell DCJ of 9 July 2014 granted on condition that the appellant pay the respondent $70,000 within 28 days; costs of the application to be costs in the cause.

Orders

  • ['Set aside the order of Cogswell DCJ of 29 October 2014.' 'Grant the appellant a stay of the judgment of Cogswell DCJ of 9 July 2014 on condition that the appellant pay to the respondent the sum of $70,000 within 28 days.' 'The costs of the application be the costs in the cause.']