Bird v McComb (No. 2) [2011] FCA 507
The Court considered it proper to preserve the capacity of Brimin Gem and SCB to continue operating in the ordinary course of business, including by allowing borrowing to discharge ordinary obligations, pending trial. The interlocutory restraints remain but are varied as specified to allow such borrowing and specified payments, and to require disclosure of trust and company financials. The underlying issue of whether the properties are trust assets or company property is for trial.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Suzanne Christine Bird; First Defendant: John Edmund McComb; Second Defendant: Brimin Gem Pty Ltd (ACN 056 330 333); Third Defendant: SCB Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 085 917 371); Fourth Defendant: Carriages Pty Ltd (ACN 063 116 852); Fifth Defendant: Newtoun Pty Ltd (ACN 006 858 788); Sixth Defendant: Austral Pacific Queensland Pty Ltd as trustee of the BM Family Trust
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations/interlocutory Injunction Application to Vary / Interlocutory (variation of Injunctions)
- Outcome
- Orders varying interlocutory restraints and requiring further disclosure; injunction maintained with variations; Austral Pacific Queensland Pty Ltd joined as sixth defendant; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Varying Interlocutory Restraint Orders, Director and Shareholder Disputes, Trust Assets and Beneficial Interests, Borrowing for Business Expenses During Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Suzanne Christine Bird
Plaintiff
John Edmund McComb
First Defendant
Brimin Gem Pty Ltd (ACN 056 330 333)
Second Defendant
SCB Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 085 917 371)
Third Defendant
Carriages Pty Ltd (ACN 063 116 852)
Fourth Defendant
Newtoun Pty Ltd (ACN 006 858 788)
Fifth Defendant
Austral Pacific Queensland Pty Ltd as trustee of the BM Family Trust
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Corporations/interlocutory Injunction Application to Vary / Interlocutory (variation of Injunctions)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants should be given leave to borrow funds to discharge interest, rates, and legal obligations despite interlocutory restraints
- 2 Whether assets are properly the subject of company or trust property
- 3 Whether the interlocutory orders restraining dealings in shares, changes in officers, or property sales/encumbrances should be varied
Ratio Decidendi
The Court considered it proper to preserve the capacity of Brimin Gem and SCB to continue operating in the ordinary course of business, including by allowing borrowing to discharge ordinary obligations, pending trial. The interlocutory restraints remain but are varied as specified to allow such borrowing and specified payments, and to require disclosure of trust and company financials. The underlying issue of whether the properties are trust assets or company property is for trial.
Court Disposition
Orders varying interlocutory restraints and requiring further disclosure; injunction maintained with variations; Austral Pacific Queensland Pty Ltd joined as sixth defendant; costs reserved.
Orders
- Leave given to Brimin Gem Pty Ltd (or Austral Pacific Queensland Pty Ltd) to borrow monies to discharge specified obligations (interest, rates, $60,000 for 26 Seafarer Ct, legal fees) as set out in affidavits.
- First and second defendants to file affidavits exhibiting financials/tax returns for the BM Family Trust 1992-2010 within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment