Suzanne Margaret Lawrence v Australian War Memorial [2014] NSWSC 757
On the balance of probabilities, there was a later will with terms identical to the 2009 Will, executed or intended as such, and the presumption of revocation by destruction is rebutted owing to clear evidence that the deceased intended to die testate. Accordingly, probate of the 2009 Will is granted.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Suzanne Margaret Lawrence; Defendant: Australian War Memorial; Second Defendant: Anne Munsie; Second Defendant: Marlene Branley; Third Defendants: Next of kin (group)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Proceedings / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Probate of the 2009 Will granted
- Legal Topics
- Lost Will, Intestacy, Probate, Dependant Relative Revocation, Execution of Wills
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Suzanne Margaret Lawrence
Plaintiff
Australian War Memorial
Defendant
Anne Munsie
Second Defendant
Marlene Branley
Second Defendant
Next of kin (group)
Third Defendants
Procedural Posture
Probate Proceedings / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a lost will should be treated as destroyed and revoked
- 2 Whether the deceased therefore died intestate
- 3 Whether probate should be granted of the 2009 Will based on a carbon copy
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, there was a later will with terms identical to the 2009 Will, executed or intended as such, and the presumption of revocation by destruction is rebutted owing to clear evidence that the deceased intended to die testate. Accordingly, probate of the 2009 Will is granted.
Court Disposition
Probate of the 2009 Will granted
Orders
- Probate of the 2009 Will granted
- Costs of all parties to the proceedings to be paid out of the deceased estate
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment