Russell v Percy [2004] NSWSC 804
The Plaintiff, though entitled to a substantial share under the will, had health and employment challenges and little by way of assets, warranting some additional provision. However, as other beneficiaries particularly Mrs Booth were in difficult circumstances, the Plaintiff was awarded a legacy of $150,000 from the shares of certain beneficiaries, not affecting Mrs Booth’s entitlement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Family Provision Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff awarded additional legacy; costs awarded out of estate.
- Legal Topics
- ['family Provision' 'adequate Provision' "testator's Intent" 'competing Claims of Beneficiaries']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Plaintiff has been left without adequate provision for her proper maintenance' 'Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to additional provision from the estate of the Deceased beyond her entitlement under the will']
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiff, though entitled to a substantial share under the will, had health and employment challenges and little by way of assets, warranting some additional provision. However, as other beneficiaries particularly Mrs Booth were in difficult circumstances, the Plaintiff was awarded a legacy of $150,000 from the shares of certain beneficiaries, not affecting Mrs Booth’s entitlement.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff awarded additional legacy; costs awarded out of estate.
Orders
- ['Plaintiff to receive a legacy of $150,000, borne by the shares of Diana Marie Percy, Luke Simpson Percy, Ruth Emily Russell and Thomas Keith Everall Russell; legacy not to bear interest if paid by 1 December 2004, else to bear interest as prescribed by statute.' 'Costs of Plaintiff on party and party basis and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment