LLOYD-WILLIAMS v MAYFIELD [2005] NSWCA 189

LLOYD-WILLIAMS v MAYFIELD [2005] NSWCA 189

It was open and appropriate for the trial judge to look beyond the respondent's immediate needs to consider advancement in life, expectations, and the particular family circumstances, given the large notional estate and lack of hardship to any other party. No error in law or principle was made by the primary judge in making the order for $850,000 as provision for the respondent, and the appeal is dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 June 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['intestacy' 'notional Estate' 'provision for Adult Child' 'discretionary Judgment' 'appeal of Provision Amount']
['family Provision' 'wills and Estates'] ['intestacy' 'notional Estate' 'provision for Adult Child' 'discretionary Judgment' 'appeal of Provision Amount']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the primary judge erred in awarding $850,000 provision out of notional estate to an adult daughter under the Family Provision Act 1982; whether the provision should be reduced to $150,000 as contended by the appellant; whether correct principles were applied regarding maintenance and advancement of the applicant; whether the interests of other family members and the use of proceeds for maintaining family business structure are relevant under the Act']

Ratio Decidendi

It was open and appropriate for the trial judge to look beyond the respondent's immediate needs to consider advancement in life, expectations, and the particular family circumstances, given the large notional estate and lack of hardship to any other party. No error in law or principle was made by the primary judge in making the order for $850,000 as provision for the respondent, and the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed' "Appellant to pay respondent's costs of the appeal out of the notional estate of the intestate" "Appellant's costs and expenses of and incidental to the appeal be paid or retained by her out of the notional estate of the intestate"]