SVMB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 86
Application for extension of time dismissed as the appeal would not succeed in light of established Full Court authorities that s 91S of the Migration Act disqualifies protection visa claims based on fear arising from non-Convention reasons such as blood feuds.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'blood Feuds' 'particular Social Group' 'convention Reasons' 'section 91 S Migration Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether extension of time should be granted to appeal from dismissal of protection visa application' 'Whether s 91S of the Migration Act operates to disqualify applicant based on blood feud not being a Convention reason']
Ratio Decidendi
Application for extension of time dismissed as the appeal would not succeed in light of established Full Court authorities that s 91S of the Migration Act disqualifies protection visa claims based on fear arising from non-Convention reasons such as blood feuds.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time dismissed
Orders
- ['Application for extension of time within which to file and serve a notice of appeal is dismissed.' "Applicant to pay first respondent's costs of the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment