In the matter of Sydney Hire NSW Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 1580
The statutory demand was set aside because the amount of costs claimed had not been determined by a gross sum costs order, agreement, or assessment, so no costs debt was due and payable when the Demand was served. In any event, the existence and amount of any debt were genuinely disputed, and the evidence did not...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside a Creditor's Statutory Demand / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Creditor's statutory demand set aside; Defendant ordered to pay the Plaintiff's costs on an indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'debt Due and Payable' 'costs Assessment' 'indemnity Costs']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside a Creditor's Statutory Demand / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was a genuine dispute about the existence or amount of the debt to which the statutory demand related under s 459H(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether there was some other reason to set aside the statutory demand under s 459J(1)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' "Whether a costs order, before agreement or assessment of the amount of costs, gave rise to a debt due and payable capable of supporting a creditor's statutory demand." 'Whether the Plaintiff should receive its costs of the application on an indemnity basis.']
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory demand was set aside because the amount of costs claimed had not been determined by a gross sum costs order, agreement, or assessment, so no costs debt was due and payable when the Demand was served. In any event, the existence and amount of any debt were genuinely disputed, and the evidence did not permit identification of a substantiated amount. Kretchmer's substantive position was unarguable in light of the correspondence and case law, justifying indemnity costs for SHN.
Court Disposition
Creditor's statutory demand set aside; Defendant ordered to pay the Plaintiff's costs on an indemnity basis.
Orders
- ["The creditor's statutory demand dated 11 August 2022 issued by Kretchmer Enterprises Pty Ltd to Sydney Hire NSW Pty Ltd be set aside." "The Defendant pay the Plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the proceedings, on an indemnity basis, as assessed or as agreed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment