Sydney Link Developments ATF Sydney Link Developments Trust v Fairfield City Council [2020] NSWLEC 1268
The proposed modification meets the requirements of section 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, is substantially the same as the original development approval, and all jurisdictional prerequisites under the Act and Local Environmental Plan are satisfied.
- Parties
- Applicant: Sydney Link Developments ATF Sydney Link Developments Trust; Respondent: Fairfield City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; modification application approved
- Legal Topics
- Modification Application, Development Consent, Deemed Refusal, Conciliation Conference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sydney Link Developments ATF Sydney Link Developments Trust
Applicant
Fairfield City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed modification is permissible under section 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- 2 Whether the modification maintains substantial sameness to the originally approved development
- 3 Whether jurisdictional prerequisites are satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed modification meets the requirements of section 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, is substantially the same as the original development approval, and all jurisdictional prerequisites under the Act and Local Environmental Plan are satisfied.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; modification application approved
Orders
- Applicant granted leave to amend application to rely on referenced plans in Annexure A
- Appeal upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment