Davies v Sydney Water Corporation [2012] NSWLEC 130
The market value of the acquired land is $1,041,100, determined by reference to an underlying residential zoning (with specified planning restrictions) and feasibility of implementing drainage works such as the Bewsher Scheme; the so-called public purpose zoning is to be disregarded under s 56(1)(a) of the Just Terms Act. The proper methodology is a before-and-after valuation reflecting these factors. No separate compensation for severance is warranted as such allowance is incorporated in the assessment of market value on the adopted assumptions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Compulsory Acquisition Compensation Claim / Judgment Prior to Final Orders
- Outcome
- No final orders; judgment indicating compensation figure and required draft orders; matter stood over for final orders and resolution of easement and costs issues.
- Legal Topics
- ['compensation Determination' 'market Value Assessment' 'public Purpose' 'underlying Land Zoning' 'severance' 'disturbance' 'easements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Acquisition Compensation Claim / Judgment Prior to Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Proper market value of land compulsorily acquired for trunk drainage; underlying zoning to be assumed for valuation; whether local or regional drainage provision required; effect of planning controls and likelihood/approval of alternative drainage solutions; entitlement to compensation for disturbance/severance/easements']
Ratio Decidendi
The market value of the acquired land is $1,041,100, determined by reference to an underlying residential zoning (with specified planning restrictions) and feasibility of implementing drainage works such as the Bewsher Scheme; the so-called public purpose zoning is to be disregarded under s 56(1)(a) of the Just Terms Act. The proper methodology is a before-and-after valuation reflecting these factors. No separate compensation for severance is warranted as such allowance is incorporated in the assessment of market value on the adopted assumptions.
Court Disposition
No final orders; judgment indicating compensation figure and required draft orders; matter stood over for final orders and resolution of easement and costs issues.
Orders
- ['Proceedings stood over to 15 June 2012 for purpose of making final orders.' 'Parties to prepare draft Short Minutes of Order by 4.00pm on 14 June 2012.' 'If disagreement, each party to provide their own draft Short Minutes of Order by that date/time.' 'If costs cannot be agreed, costs issue to be argued 15 June...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment