Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation [2023] NSWLEC 68

Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation [2023] NSWLEC 68

The appropriate penalty for each offence of water pollution is determined by assessing objective seriousness (volume, duration, impact, measures taken or not taken, foreseeability, control), mitigating subjective circumstances (guilty pleas, remorse, good character, assistance), the need for specific and general deterrence, and proportionality. Applying statutory maximums, discounts for the utilitarian value of guilty pleas, and a totality discount, and considering the consistency with prior decisions, Syndey Water Corporation is sentenced to an aggregate penalty of $365,625, divided equally between the Environmental Trust and the prosecutor, with further orders for publication and costs.

Parties
Prosecutor: Environment Protection Authority; Defendant: Sydney Water Corporation
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 July 2023
Procedural Posture
Sentencing for Environmental Offences (class 5) / Sentence After Guilty Pleas
Outcome
Defendant convicted and sentenced (Sydney Water Corporation) on three counts of polluting waters contrary to s 120(1) of the POEO Act. Aggregate penalty imposed after discounts for guilty pleas and totality; specific orders made for payment, publication, and costs.
Legal Topics
Pollution of Waters, Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (nsw), Sentencing for Environmental Offences, Corporate Liability, Utilitarian Discount, Totality Principle, Publication Order
Environmental Law Criminal Law Sentencing Pollution of Waters Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (nsw) Sentencing for Environmental Offences Corporate Liability Utilitarian Discount +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 58 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Environment Protection Authority

Prosecutor

Sydney Water Corporation

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Sentencing for Environmental Offences (class 5) / Sentence After Guilty Pleas

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate penalty for Sydney Water Corporation's three offences of polluting waters contrary to s 120(1) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW)?
  2. 2 What is the objective seriousness of each offence?
  3. 3 What are the relevant subjective circumstances of the offender?

Ratio Decidendi

The appropriate penalty for each offence of water pollution is determined by assessing objective seriousness (volume, duration, impact, measures taken or not taken, foreseeability, control), mitigating subjective circumstances (guilty pleas, remorse, good character, assistance), the need for specific and general deterrence, and proportionality. Applying statutory maximums, discounts for the utilitarian value of guilty pleas, and a totality discount, and considering the consistency with prior decisions, Syndey Water Corporation is sentenced to an aggregate penalty of $365,625, divided equally between the Environmental Trust and the prosecutor, with further orders for publication and costs.

Court Disposition

Defendant convicted and sentenced (Sydney Water Corporation) on three counts of polluting waters contrary to s 120(1) of the POEO Act. Aggregate penalty imposed after discounts for guilty pleas and totality; specific orders made for payment, publication, and costs.

Orders

  • Sydney Water Corporation convicted of three offences against s 120(1) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW).
  • Ordered to pay a total penalty of $365,625 (allocated: $219,375 for Offence 1, $73,125 for Offence 2, $73,125 for Offence 3).