Sydney Water Corporation v The Persons Listed in the Schedules trading as PricewaterhouseCoopers [2008] NSWSC 361
Section 38(1) of the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983 does not prevent the Auditor-General from producing documents to the Court in compliance with a subpoena, as the Court is not 'any person' within the meaning of the section. Therefore, the Auditor-General is required to comply with the subpoena.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Sydney Water Corporation; Defendants/respondents: The Persons Listed in the Schedules trading as PricewaterhouseCoopers; Applicant (on Motion): Auditor-General of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Subpoena
- Outcome
- Motion to set aside subpoena dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Subpoena to Produce Documents, Statutory Interpretation, Secrecy Provisions, Public Finance and Audit Act 1983
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sydney Water Corporation
Plaintiff
The Persons Listed in the Schedules trading as PricewaterhouseCoopers
Defendants/respondents
Auditor-General of New South Wales
Applicant (on Motion)
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Subpoena
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Auditor-General is required to comply with a subpoena to produce documents in light of secrecy provisions in s 38(1) of the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983
- 2 Interpretation of 'any person' in the context of statutory secrecy provisions
- 3 Whether production to the court constitutes communication to 'any person' under s 38(1)
Ratio Decidendi
Section 38(1) of the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983 does not prevent the Auditor-General from producing documents to the Court in compliance with a subpoena, as the Court is not 'any person' within the meaning of the section. Therefore, the Auditor-General is required to comply with the subpoena.
Court Disposition
Motion to set aside subpoena dismissed
Orders
- The applicant's motion to be excused from producing the documents pursuant to s 38(1) of the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983 is dismissed.
- Parties to file Short Minutes of Order dismissing the Motion with an agreed order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment