Environment Protection Authority v. Sydney Water Corporation [1998] NSWLEC 144

Environment Protection Authority v. Sydney Water Corporation [1998] NSWLEC 144

Sydney Water Corporation failed to maintain the penstock controls in an efficient condition by not detecting and correcting the incorrect phase rotation of emergency power, resulting in the penstocks operating in reverse and failing to function efficiently during a critical emergency, which constituted a breach of Condition L4 of its pollution control licence.

Parties
Prosecutor: Environment Protection Authority; Defendant: Sydney Water Corporation
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 December 1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Judgment (liability Only)
Outcome
offence proved beyond reasonable doubt
Legal Topics
Pollution Control Licence, Maintenance Obligations, Sewage Treatment Plant Operations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Environment Protection Authority

Prosecutor

Sydney Water Corporation

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Judgment (liability Only)

  1. 1 Whether Sydney Water Corporation contravened Condition L4 of pollution control licence number 000378 by failing to maintain the North Head Sewage Treatment Plant in an efficient condition
  2. 2 Whether the failure to carry out electrical maintenance on penstock controls constituted a breach
  3. 3 Whether structural maintenance and flood prevention of penstocks and the pump chamber were adequate under Condition L4

Ratio Decidendi

Sydney Water Corporation failed to maintain the penstock controls in an efficient condition by not detecting and correcting the incorrect phase rotation of emergency power, resulting in the penstocks operating in reverse and failing to function efficiently during a critical emergency, which constituted a breach of Condition L4 of its pollution control licence.

Court Disposition

offence proved beyond reasonable doubt