Ure v Waverley Council [2016] NSWLEC 1560
Parties having reached agreement at, or following, a conciliation conference under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Court being satisfied that the decision is one it could have made, the Court must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement without determining merits.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference (final Orders by Consent)
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld by consent; Development Application approved subject to conditions; Costs order made.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference (final Orders by Consent)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether parties may resolve a development application appeal by agreement at conciliation conference under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Ratio Decidendi
Parties having reached agreement at, or following, a conciliation conference under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Court being satisfied that the decision is one it could have made, the Court must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement without determining merits.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld by consent; Development Application approved subject to conditions; Costs order made.
Orders
- ["The applicant is granted leave to amend their development application in accordance with the plans referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure 'A'." 'The Appeal is upheld.' "Development Application No. DA-11/2016 demolition of existing structures and construction of a two storey dwelling and attached secondary dwelling...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment