SZAAD v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 467
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to provide any satisfactory explanation for the two-year delay in seeking to appeal and there was no viable ground of appeal disclosed; the application was thus an abuse of process and without merit.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time / Hearing and Final Decision on Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal and for extension of time dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'procedural Fairness']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time / Hearing and Final Decision on Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an extension of time to appeal should be granted more than two years after consent orders were made' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted in circumstances where the draft notice of appeal does not disclose a viable ground of appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to provide any satisfactory explanation for the two-year delay in seeking to appeal and there was no viable ground of appeal disclosed; the application was thus an abuse of process and without merit.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal and for extension of time dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal and for an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment