SZACN v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 564
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because there was no suggestion of jurisdictional error and the issues had been previously determined by the Tribunal and reviewed through multiple levels of courts, amounting to an abuse of process.
- Parties
- Applicant: SZACN; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Abuse of Process, Protection Visa, Jurisdictional Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZACN
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
First Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Magistrate erred in dismissing the proceedings as an abuse of process
- 2 Whether jurisdictional error was established in the decision of the delegate
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because there was no suggestion of jurisdictional error and the issues had been previously determined by the Tribunal and reviewed through multiple levels of courts, amounting to an abuse of process.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.
- The applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed at $900.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment