SZAPF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 553
Leave to appeal must be refused as the application to challenge the delegate's decision was an abuse of process, having repeatedly raised issues already finally determined, and having no prospects of success.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination of Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'abuse of Process' 'appeals' 'protection Visas']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination of Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Magistrates Court’s dismissal of an application for judicial review as an abuse of process']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal must be refused as the application to challenge the delegate's decision was an abuse of process, having repeatedly raised issues already finally determined, and having no prospects of success.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed at $1000.00."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment