SZATMARY V. PIN & BALL LIMITED

The appellant was not entitled to any further sum for the price of the machines delivered as at the date the writ commenced; the material evidence and pleadings did not make out such a case.

Parties: Appellant: SZATMARY; Respondent: PIN & BALL LIMITED
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 29 July 1970
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Judgment
Outcome: appeal dismissed with costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

SZATMARY

Appellant

PIN & BALL LIMITED

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the appellant was entitled to a further sum for the price of 20 machines delivered beyond what had already been paid

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant was not entitled to any further sum for the price of the machines delivered as at the date the writ commenced; the material evidence and pleadings did not make out such a case.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

Appeal dismissed with costs