SZAUB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 977
The Federal Magistrate's decision was correct; the Tribunal decision was previously found to be free from jurisdictional error and the application for further review is an abuse of process. The applicant had an adequate opportunity to contest jurisdictional error. Leave to appeal is refused and the application is dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: SZAUB; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Abuse of Process, Refugee Status, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZAUB
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
First Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted from Federal Magistrate's judgment dismissing judicial review as incompetent
- 2 Whether the proceedings are an abuse of process
- 3 Whether further applications can be filed without leave
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Magistrate's decision was correct; the Tribunal decision was previously found to be free from jurisdictional error and the application for further review is an abuse of process. The applicant had an adequate opportunity to contest jurisdictional error. Leave to appeal is refused and the application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
- The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment