SZBDK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 639
The appellant did not make submissions to spell out the substance of the grounds of appeal. Having regard to the generalised grounds and the regularity in the reasons for judgment of the Federal Magistrate and the Tribunal, no jurisdictional error was disclosed, so the appeal was dismissed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court Dismissing an Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'judiciary Act 1903 (cth) S 39 B' 'migration Act 1958 (cth) S 474']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court Dismissing an Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Magistrate erred by failing to find an error of law, jurisdictional error or breach of procedural fairness in the Tribunal decision' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to disclose adverse country information used against the appellant' "Whether the Federal Magistrate erred concerning the appellant's claims of fear of harm, persecution, religious beliefs and membership of a particular social group"]
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not make submissions to spell out the substance of the grounds of appeal. Having regard to the generalised grounds and the regularity in the reasons for judgment of the Federal Magistrate and the Tribunal, no jurisdictional error was disclosed, so the appeal was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment