SZBDK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 639

SZBDK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 639

The appellant did not make submissions to spell out the substance of the grounds of appeal. Having regard to the generalised grounds and the regularity in the reasons for judgment of the Federal Magistrate and the Tribunal, no jurisdictional error was disclosed, so the appeal was dismissed with costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 May 2005
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court Dismissing an Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'judiciary Act 1903 (cth) S 39 B' 'migration Act 1958 (cth) S 474']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court Dismissing an Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa

  1. 1 ['Whether the Federal Magistrate erred by failing to find an error of law, jurisdictional error or breach of procedural fairness in the Tribunal decision' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to disclose adverse country information used against the appellant' "Whether the Federal Magistrate erred concerning the appellant's claims of fear of harm, persecution, religious beliefs and membership of a particular social group"]

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant did not make submissions to spell out the substance of the grounds of appeal. Having regard to the generalised grounds and the regularity in the reasons for judgment of the Federal Magistrate and the Tribunal, no jurisdictional error was disclosed, so the appeal was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs."]