SZBDL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 865

The applicant identified no error in the Federal Magistrate's approach and had no prospects of success in any appeal, so the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 14 June 2006
Procedural Posture: Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From a Federal Magistrate's Judgment Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics: ['refugee Review Tribunal Decision' 'judicial Review' 'leave to Appeal' 'prospects of Success' 'costs']

['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['refugee Review Tribunal Decision' 'judicial Review' 'leave to Appeal' 'prospects of Success' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From a Federal Magistrate's Judgment Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review

Legal Issues

1 ["Whether leave should be granted to appeal from the Federal Magistrate's judgment dismissing the applicant's judicial review application." "Whether the applicant identified any error in the Federal Magistrate's approach or had prospects of success on an appeal."]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant identified no error in the Federal Magistrate's approach and had no prospects of success in any appeal, so the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

['The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $1100.00."]