SZBOL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 260

SZBOL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 260

Since the applicant withdrew the application for leave to appeal after receiving legal advice, it was appropriate to dismiss the application and, in the exercise of discretion, make no order as to costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve an Application for Leave to Appeal / Hearing and Final Determination
Outcome
Application dismissed. No order as to costs.
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'costs']
['administrative Law' 'immigration Law'] ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve an Application for Leave to Appeal / Hearing and Final Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether to grant an extension of time to file and serve an application for leave to appeal' 'Whether an order for costs should be made after withdrawal of the application']

Ratio Decidendi

Since the applicant withdrew the application for leave to appeal after receiving legal advice, it was appropriate to dismiss the application and, in the exercise of discretion, make no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed. No order as to costs.

Orders

  • ['The application is dismissed.' 'No order as to costs.']