SZBPF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 867
It was not apparent that the Federal Magistrate erred in dismissing the application for judicial review, and there were no prospects of the applicant succeeding in any appeal; leave to appeal was therefore dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against a Federal Magistrate's Judgment Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['refugee Review Tribunal Decision' 'judicial Review' 'abuse of Process' 'leave to Appeal' 'out of Time Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against a Federal Magistrate's Judgment Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the Federal Magistrate's dismissal of the judicial review application." 'Whether the Federal Magistrate erred in concluding that the judicial review application was an abuse of process.' 'Whether the application was incompetent because it was filed out of time.']
Ratio Decidendi
It was not apparent that the Federal Magistrate erred in dismissing the application for judicial review, and there were no prospects of the applicant succeeding in any appeal; leave to appeal was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The Refugee Review Tribunal be joined as second respondent.' 'The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicants to pay the Minister's costs in the amount of $1,100."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment