SZBPS v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 362

SZBPS v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 362

Leave to appeal was refused and the application dismissed because the decision below was interlocutory, the applicant provided no basis for proceeding in light of the extensive history of unsuccessful applications concerning the same RRT decision, no substantial injustice would be occasioned by refusing the further application, and no error was apparent on the material before the Court.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 April 2006
Procedural Posture
Migration Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From a Federal Magistrates Court Decision Dismissing a Judicial Review Application as an Abuse of Process
Outcome
The application was dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa Review' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Judgment' 'abuse of Process' 'procedural Fairness']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'federal Appellate Procedure'] ['protection Visa Review' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Judgment' 'abuse of Process' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From a Federal Magistrates Court Decision Dismissing a Judicial Review Application as an Abuse of Process

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal from the Federal Magistrates Court decision dismissing his judicial review application as an abuse of process.' "Whether the Federal Magistrate's decision was an interlocutory judgment requiring leave to appeal under the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)." 'Whether the applicant identified any error or substantial injustice arising from the alleged RRT breach of s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 or other asserted procedural unfairness.']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused and the application dismissed because the decision below was interlocutory, the applicant provided no basis for proceeding in light of the extensive history of unsuccessful applications concerning the same RRT decision, no substantial injustice would be occasioned by refusing the further application, and no error was apparent on the material before the Court.

Court Disposition

The application was dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of $2000."]