SZBQV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 499
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicants failed to raise any arguable grounds or identify any error in the previous decision, and their conduct constituted an abuse of process by relitigating matters already determined.
- Parties
- Applicant: SZBQV; Applicant: SZBRC; Applicant: SZBRD; Applicant: SZBRE; Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs on an indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Leave to Appeal, Finality of Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZBQV
Applicant
SZBRC
Applicant
SZBRD
Applicant
SZBRE
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal raised any arguable ground of appeal
- 2 Whether the proceedings constituted an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicants failed to raise any arguable grounds or identify any error in the previous decision, and their conduct constituted an abuse of process by relitigating matters already determined.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs on an indemnity basis.
Orders
- Leave granted nunc pro tunc to substitute the name 'Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs' for that of the Respondent.
- Application for leave to appeal to Federal Court dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment