SZCNP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1476

Leave to appeal was refused because the Federal Magistrate was correct to treat the second judicial review application concerning the Tribunal's 17 December 2003 decision as an abuse of process, and the applicant identified no further or different ground that would give the proposed appeal any prospects of success.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 18 September 2007
Procedural Posture: Application for Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of an Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Leave to Appeal
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics: ['refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'leave to Appeal' 'abuse of Process']

['immigration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'leave to Appeal' 'abuse of Process']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of an Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 ["Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the Federal Magistrate's dismissal of the application for judicial review." 'Whether the second Federal Magistrates Court application seeking judicial review of the same Refugee Review Tribunal decision was an abuse of process.' 'Whether the proposed appeal had prospects of success.']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

['The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $1200."]