SZCQH v Minister for Immigration Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 484

SZCQH v Minister for Immigration Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 484

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's affidavit and draft notice of appeal did not address Nicholls FM's reasons, the test in Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 was not met, and the applicant had not shown any arguable case that the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision might be quashed for jurisdictional error.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 April 2005
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal From a Judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Refusing a Protection Visa / Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'leave to Appeal' 'dismissal for Non Compliance']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'leave to Appeal' 'dismissal for Non Compliance']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal From a Judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Refusing a Protection Visa / Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Magistrates Court order dismissing the applicant's judicial review application under r 13.03 of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules." "Whether the applicant showed an arguable case that the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision might be quashed for jurisdictional error."]

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's affidavit and draft notice of appeal did not address Nicholls FM's reasons, the test in Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 was not met, and the applicant had not shown any arguable case that the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision might be quashed for jurisdictional error.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused with costs.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal is refused with costs.']